1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C201102102208.07611.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002520.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002523.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile</H1>
<B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C201102102208.07611.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Feb 10 22:08:07 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002520.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002523.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2522">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2522">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2522">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2522">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 21:32:37 schreef Dexter Morgan:
><i> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Maarten Vanraes
</I>><i>
</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> > Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 19:57:08 schreef Dexter Morgan:
</I>><i> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Maarten Vanraes
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> >> > Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 10:34:48 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
</I>><i> >> >> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 10:15:59, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
</I>><i> >> >> > On 9 February 2011 21:52, <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">root at mageia.org</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> >> >> > > update version in Makefile
</I>><i> >> >> > >
</I>><i> >> >> > > Modified Paths
</I>><i> >> >> > >
</I>><i> >> >> > > drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
</I>><i> >> >> > >
</I>><i> >> >> > > Modified: drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
</I>><i> >> >> > > =================================================================
</I>><i> >> >> > > == --- drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile 2011-02-09 20:24:08
</I>><i> >> >> > > UTC (rev 495) +++ drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
</I>><i> >> >> > > 2011-02-09 20:52:01 UTC (rev 496) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
</I>><i> >> >> > > -VERSION = 2011.0
</I>><i> >> >> > > +VERSION = 1
</I>><i> >> >> > >
</I>><i> >> >> > > PRODUCT = drakx-installer-advertising
</I>><i> >> >> >
</I>><i> >> >> > I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
</I>><i> >> >> > I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
</I>><i> >> >> > (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
</I>><i> >> >> >
</I>><i> >> >> > on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian
</I>><i> >> >> > so I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
</I>><i> >> >> > WDYT?
</I>><i> >> >>
</I>><i> >> >> I saw no public discussion about it (maybe in a meeting for which I
</I>><i> >> >> didn't read the logs). I like having the year in release version, but
</I>><i> >> >> I infered from what I saw that version 1 seems to be what has been
</I>><i> >> >> chosen. However, that may be to late to discuss since the alpha is
</I>><i> >> >> due in 5 days from now.
</I>><i> >> >>
</I>><i> >> >> Samuel
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >> > i was under the opinion that people said "Release 1" as a temporary
</I>><i> >> > measure, until the discussion had been settled...
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >> > i too prefer the year in the release, makes it easier to remember.
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> i hardly see how this is easier to remember.
</I>><i> >> I really like the way fedora does F14, F15, ...
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> but this is just my opinion :)
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > well, tbf, will it be ok to have F143 in the future? it seems a bit ...
</I>><i> > languish ... to me.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> and mageia 3501.1 is something better ? :)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> come on you have just personnal feeling here not something with arguments.
</I>
if we're in the year 3501, then yes easier to remember.
but indeed, this is all personal feelings and it has no arguments, except that
the current or last X years are easier to remember , rather then an abitrary
number.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002520.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002523.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2522">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2522">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2522">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2522">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
