blob: 95f75c44bf7d9b05ddfbd393eef06050ff93bf18 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C20110210190811.GV21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002521.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002515.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile</H1>
<B>nicolas vigier</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B496%5D%20update%20version%20in%20Makefile&In-Reply-To=%3C20110210190811.GV21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile">boklm at mars-attacks.org
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Feb 10 20:08:11 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002521.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002515.html">[Mageia-dev] announcing magpie
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2518">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2518">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2518">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2518">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
><i>
</I>><i> I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
</I>><i> I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
</I>><i> (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
</I>><i> I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
</I>><i> WDYT?
</I>
I like "traditionnal" versionning.
Version number was discussed a little in IRC meeting in december, when
talking about release tags :
<A HREF="http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-meeting/2010/mageia-meeting.2010-12-01-19.37.log.html">http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-meeting/2010/mageia-meeting.2010-12-01-19.37.log.html</A>
Maybe in other discussions I forgot too.
It has not been discussed a lot. But now it's probably too late to change
it, now that this release number has been used everywhere.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002521.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002515.html">[Mageia-dev] announcing magpie
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2518">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2518">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2518">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2518">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|