1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Python Packaging Policy
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Python%20Packaging%20Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C1295308449.24697.82.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002212.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002217.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Python Packaging Policy</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Python%20Packaging%20Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C1295308449.24697.82.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Python Packaging Policy">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Jan 18 00:54:09 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002212.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002217.html">[Mageia-dev] Python Packaging Policy
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2213">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2213">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2213">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2213">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le lundi 17 janvier 2011 à 21:03 +0100, philippe makowski a écrit :
><i> 2011/1/17 Michael scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>>:
</I>><i> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0100, philippe makowski wrote:
</I>><i> >> Hi,
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
</I>><i> >> unfortunately it was not the case.
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
</I>><i> >> (<A HREF="http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy">http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy</A>)
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > That's just a draft, but as the one that wrote the draft, could I
</I>><i> > know what is wrong with what was written so far ?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> nothing except it is just a draft ;)
</I>
Well, i just didn't think i had the authority to impose it, nor much
time to discuss it, so I never removed the draft label.
><i> >> so I propose to use the Fedora one
</I>><i> >> (<A HREF="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python</A>) with some cleaning.
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> Can we provide same macros as in In Fedora 13 and greater ?
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> Do you see any major problem with the Fedora policy ?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > First they make plan for having more than one version of python, something
</I>><i> > that I always told I will not do since no one stepped to do much to help
</I>><i> > on the transition. In short, as long the python team will in practice be only me
</I>><i> > ( and in practice, I mean "people who effectivly commit" ), we will have only 1 supported
</I>><i> > version of the stack.
</I>><i> > ( I consider python 3 to be a different language, because of the
</I>><i> > source level incompatibility ).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > There is also the issue on bytecompilation ( <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=50484">https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=50484</A> ).
</I>><i> > I have exposed there the various problem, and apart from explaining
</I>><i> > that the solution I chosed was not better than the other, no one gave a compeling
</I>><i> > argument into one or the others alternatives.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Finally, a vast part of the policy is handling 2to3, a topic that we didn't discuss
</I>><i> > at all, and I would not be confortable to adopt it without first looking at it and
</I>><i> > discussing it.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Not to mention that our policy draft speak of thing they do not include
</I>><i> > ( like naming policy, for a start ).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> No problem, I understand perfectly
</I>><i> so let start with the Mandriva draft
</I>
We can merge part of their policy , I am not against it, I just think we
should not adopt everything :)
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002212.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for Mageia: implement bitorrent protocol to allow updates download
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002217.html">[Mageia-dev] Python Packaging Policy
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2213">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2213">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2213">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2213">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
