1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20New%20bugzilla%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C4D2A5E17.5080505%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002044.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002048.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal</H1>
<B>andre999</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20New%20bugzilla%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C4D2A5E17.5080505%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal">andr55 at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Jan 10 02:17:11 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002044.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Ruby packaging policy
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002048.html">[Mageia-dev] Choosing packagers representatives
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2046">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2046">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2046">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2046">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Frederic Janssens a écrit :
><i>
</I>><i> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 17:49, andre999<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andr55 at laposte.net</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Frederic Janssens a écrit :
</I>>><i>
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 06:19, andre999<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andr55 at laposte.net</A>> wrote:
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i> As for documentation and translations, a while back I suggested a similar separation, but on reflection I think it would be more useful to have flags :
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i> 1) problem with documentation (and not function)
</I>>>>><i> These bugs would be best corrected by those with good documentation skills, not necessarily the average programmmer.
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>><i> 2) problem with translation (and not function)
</I>>>>><i> These bugs would be best corrected by technical translators for the language in question. Again, not necessarily the average programmer.
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> I am working on a script intended to make it easyer to report bugs usefully.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> Technically, would these flags be new fields,
</I>>>><i> or standardized entries in the Keywords field,
</I>>>><i> such as NEEDINFO in the present Mandriva bugzilla ?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Just verified with bugzilla to make sure.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Documentation and translations are listed as options under "components".
</I>>><i> However any such bug could also be associated with another component, such as "core packages" or "release media".
</I>>><i> We could even have translation bugs of documentation.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> So it would seem better if these were independant flags, instead of options.
</I>>><i> It that case they would be new fields.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> As for security, there are already 2 such flags, at the bottom of the main bug entry page. (Under the title "privacy".)
</I>>><i> Checking either of these flags will cause a bug to be hidden from most users, as explained beside the check boxes.
</I>>><i> (For this reason, it would be better to _not_ duplicate these particular flags elsewhere.)
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> see <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mandriva">https://qa.mandriva.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mandriva</A> Linux&format=guided
</I>><i>
</I>><i> The potential problem with new fields, which would be better,
</I>><i> would be to make shure that they are accessible with the xmlrpc interface,
</I>><i> that I use for my script.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> The inbuilt Keywords field, which does not appear on the Mandriva
</I>><i> 'guided' input page,
</I>><i> but does appear on the 'expert' input page, is accessible with the
</I>><i> xmlrpc interface.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> The xmlrpc interface does not seem to automatically have access to all fields.
</I>><i> But it is difficult to be shure : the xmlrpc interface of Mandriva
</I>><i> bugzilla does not work;
</I>><i> and the Mageia bugzilla only has the default fields at present.
</I>><i> I think I will have to create a local bugzilla to test that.
</I>
I have been working on a modified bugzilla entry page - only the user
side, but it shows the layout I had in mind
not quite finished - I'll post it on the list (or elsewhere if you wish)
when done.
><i>
</I>>><i> Good luck with your script :)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Thanks
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> André
</I>
--
André
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002044.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Ruby packaging policy
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002048.html">[Mageia-dev] Choosing packagers representatives
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2046">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2046">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2046">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2046">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
