blob: 71e9a0f1b1077142844b6d9810e91d61c2035bb7 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E84C92A.6060300%40mageia.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008508.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="008513.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?</H1>
<B>Thomas Backlund</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E84C92A.6060300%40mageia.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?">tmb at mageia.org
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Sep 29 21:38:18 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008508.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008513.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8510">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8510">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8510">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8510">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22:
><i> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
</I>>><i> And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Guarantee, no, but the combined total number of days delayed over the
</I>><i> last 5 years or so is probably 1 day. The release cycle is *very*
</I>><i> stable.
</I>><i>
</I>
But as you stated its only a "likely" schedule so far,
and the <A HREF="https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree">https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree</A> also states
"! Attention: This schedule is still a draft to discuss."
so I'm not conviced so far, and it also means noe even our final RC
would have final gnome packages available, wich means a lot of beta/rc
testing wont be done on it... meaning not really a "quality release"
for Mageia 2.
--
Thomas
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008508.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008513.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8510">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8510">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8510">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8510">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|