1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS !
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20MANDATORY%20READ%20%3A%207%20days%20before%0A%20misc%20unleashes%20CERBERUS%20%21&In-Reply-To=%3C4E7E9C38.2070100%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008164.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="008107.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS !</H1>
<B>andre999</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20MANDATORY%20READ%20%3A%207%20days%20before%0A%20misc%20unleashes%20CERBERUS%20%21&In-Reply-To=%3C4E7E9C38.2070100%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS !">andre999mga at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Sep 25 05:12:56 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008164.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS !
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008107.html">[Mageia-dev] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS!
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8377">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8377">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8377">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8377">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Anssi Hannula a écrit :
><i> On 16.09.2011 19:48, Colin Guthrie wrote:
</I>>><i> 'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 16/09/11 14:39 did gyre and gimble:
</I>>>><i> Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 à 12:44 +0200, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
</I>>>>><i> Le 16/09/2011 11:47, Sander Lepik a écrit :
</I>>>>>><i> 15.09.2011 21:43, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas:
</I>>>>>>><i> I have a script ready to set the last comittor (that's a full
</I>>>>>>><i> packager) as
</I>>>>>>><i> maintainer. perhaps it can be activated before the GREAT PURGE.
</I>>>>>><i> That's not so good idea. What we maybe can do is that we send out a
</I>>>>>><i> warning that if you commit to a package after the warning and the
</I>>>>>><i> package has no maintainer yet then you become one. So that people would
</I>>>>>><i> first check what they get on their name. Many packages were imported by
</I>>>>>><i> Anne, i'm not sure that she's going to maintain them all. :)
</I>>>>>><i>
</I>>>>>><i> I would do something like that:
</I>>>>>><i> 2 months of warning period, if you touch package that has no maintainer
</I>>>>>><i> you become its maintainer. After 2 months we start dropping those
</I>>>>>><i> packages that have still no maintainer.
</I>>>>><i> This whole idea of 'touch a package, become its maintainer' assumes than
</I>>>>><i> anyone modifying a package has an obvious interest in it.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> Then we can increase the heuristic, like "upgrade to a new version", or
</I>>>><i> "do several commit on it". Someone upgrading a package either :
</I>>>><i> - is interested in it for the package ( and thus would be a maintainer )
</I>>>><i> - is interested into having it upgraded for using on another package
</I>>>><i> ( and thus, as a user of the rpm for another rpm, has a interest to not
</I>>>><i> make it disappear ).
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> And i doubt that someone would do X commit on a rpm if not interested in
</I>>>><i> it.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Are heuristics a good idea? How about just making mgarepo ask you if you
</I>>><i> want to become the maintainer with a Y/n option (Y being default) when
</I>>><i> you call submit on an unmaintained package.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> This should be simple enough that people genuinely maintaining it can
</I>>><i> just hit return and also easy enough to opt out in the case of drive by
</I>>><i> upgrades.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> This seems like a nice idea :)
</I>><i>
</I>I like it too :)
--
André
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008164.html">[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-discuss] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS !
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008107.html">[Mageia-dev] MANDATORY READ : 7 days before misc unleashes CERBERUS!
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8377">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8377">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8377">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8377">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
