blob: f1221001d1ad0d447fe8d23596bf83cd16badc61 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20noarch%20vs.%20arch&In-Reply-To=%3C201109020834.58936.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="007754.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="007764.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch</H1>
<B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20noarch%20vs.%20arch&In-Reply-To=%3C201109020834.58936.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Sep 2 08:34:58 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007754.html">[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007764.html">[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7756">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7756">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7756">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7756">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op vrijdag 02 september 2011 05:38:01 schreef Funda Wang:
><i> 2011/9/2 Thomas Spuhler <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">thomas at btspuhler.com</A>>:
</I>><i> > When upgrading lilypond I noticed that someone else mad the doc package
</I>><i> > noarch to "make the huge doc subpackage be noarch"
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > 1. What is the advantage of this? We have noarch packages in i586 and
</I>><i> > x86_64 anyway
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We may split noarch packages into a new directory in the future, like
</I>><i> what opensuse is doing. That will save a lot of space for mirrors.
</I>
afaik noarch is hardlinked, plus underlying storage might have deduplication.
><i> > 2. The result wasn't as intended, we now have the arch + noarch package
</I>><i> > in the repos
</I>><i>
</I>><i> That is another problem, exists for years in mandriva. maybe bugs in
</I>><i> uploading script.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> > --
</I>><i> > Thomas
</I></PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007754.html">[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="007764.html">[Mageia-dev] noarch vs. arch
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#7756">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#7756">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#7756">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#7756">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|