blob: 3c1a219aca9b0993b49eda9d3f9e8e55a9a0aa66 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Updating%20ruby%20to%201.9.3%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EAE4D8E.2090008%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009231.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="009234.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?</H1>
<B>Anne Nicolas</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Updating%20ruby%20to%201.9.3%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EAE4D8E.2090008%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?">ennael1 at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Oct 31 08:26:06 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009231.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009234.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9232">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9232">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9232">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9232">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 31/10/2011 07:12, Funda Wang a écrit :
><i> Hello,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> After reading this:
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7">http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7</A>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We will support mageia 2 for 18 months (May 2012 to Nov 2013). But
</I>><i> upstream will end ruby 1.8.7 at the time of June 2013. That means, we
</I>><i> won't have any support from upstream even for security issues from
</I>><i> June 2013 to Nov 2013. Of course, if mageia 2 be delayed....
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Should we update ruby into 1.9 so that we still have support from upstream?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Especially the answer from current maintainer pascal.
</I>
Whatever the decision please wait after alpha1 so that we have
consistent isos. Also you should ask Shikamaru (rémi clouard) who is
working at the moment on Ruby
><i>
</I>><i> Regards.
</I>
--
Anne
<A HREF="http://mageia.org">http://mageia.org</A>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009231.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009234.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9232">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9232">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9232">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9232">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|