1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C20111026162137.GA23516%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009128.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="009130.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging</H1>
<B>Michael scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C20111026162137.GA23516%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 26 18:21:37 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009128.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009130.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9129">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9129">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9129">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9129">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Florian Hubold wrote:
><i> Am 26.10.2011 06:59, schrieb Michael Scherer:
</I>><i> >Le samedi 22 octobre 2011 à 08:41 +0100, Philippe Reynes a écrit :
</I>><i> >>Hi,
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team,
</I>><i> >>and they answered me that E17 is "rolling release". So no
</I>><i> >>stable release (or vert vert few).
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date.
</I>><i> >>If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream.
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >>What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
</I>><i> >How will it go for stable support ?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >IE, once mageia 2 is out ?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> We have better chances for bugfixes, don't think the snapshots which
</I>><i> we used till now ( nearly one year old and also only based on
</I>><i> the development release) will get some love anymore.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> For security issues, there were none that i'm aware of except for imlib2.
</I>
There is at least one that I found and reported 2 times ( albeit not using the
public bugtracker ) that didn't get corrected, just look
at <A HREF="http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c">http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c</A>
( a little help : the issue is in the first 25 lines )
><i> But if you argument this way, we should stay with the packages we have
</I>><i> until E17 is fully stable and release, but i don't see how this would be better.
</I>
We cannot at the same time say
"we offer quality package and take care of fixing them" and at the same time,
just say that we won't.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009128.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009130.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9129">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9129">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9129">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9129">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
