1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Detailed version of the Mageia Unmaintained Packages
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Detailed%20version%20of%20the%20Mageia%20Unmaintained%0A%09Packages&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8CA3A1.8080606%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008627.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="008625.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Detailed version of the Mageia Unmaintained Packages</H1>
<B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Detailed%20version%20of%20the%20Mageia%20Unmaintained%0A%09Packages&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8CA3A1.8080606%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Detailed version of the Mageia Unmaintained Packages">guillomovitch at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 5 20:36:17 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008627.html">[Mageia-dev] Detailed version of the Mageia Unmaintained Packages
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008625.html">[Mageia-dev] Updated package (gscan2pdf) and mentorship request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8643">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8643">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8643">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8643">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 05/10/2011 01:44, Johnny A. Solbu a écrit :
><i> On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:42, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
</I>>><i> Nearly 3000 Mageia packages are on the unmaintained list. I've prepared
</I>>><i> more detailed version.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I notice that, according to this list, rsh is still provided. Why?
</I>><i> Isn't OpenSSH a complete, secure, replacement?
</I>Security isn't always a concern, and other issues may be more important
in some context. HPC is a perfect example. Also, they are secure usage
of rsh (and other tools relying on clear-text protocols), such as OTP
and kerberos tokens.
><i> Telnet I can understand, as it is also used to debug network problems.
</I>><i> rsh should be dumped in order to urge the use of secure alternatives like OpenSSH, in my oppinion.
</I>Only old timers use this kind of tools, I guess they know better than
packagers what they should do... So, as long as there is a volonteer to
maintain a package, I don't see how dropping it would make the situation
better for anyone.
--
Guillaume
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008627.html">[Mageia-dev] Detailed version of the Mageia Unmaintained Packages
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008625.html">[Mageia-dev] Updated package (gscan2pdf) and mentorship request
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8643">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8643">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8643">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8643">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
