summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009854.html
blob: b06f62a8acd09868a3cda0080722a14d240cf852 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] ffmpeg in mageia1 updates testing (revision 171164)
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20ffmpeg%20in%20mageia1%20updates%20testing%20%28revision%20171164%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4ED10030.8090707%40mageia.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="009850.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="009792.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] ffmpeg in mageia1 updates testing (revision 171164)</H1>
    <B>Anssi Hannula</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20ffmpeg%20in%20mageia1%20updates%20testing%20%28revision%20171164%29&In-Reply-To=%3C4ED10030.8090707%40mageia.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] ffmpeg in mageia1 updates testing (revision 171164)">anssi at mageia.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sat Nov 26 16:05:20 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009850.html">[Mageia-dev] ffmpeg in mageia1 updates testing (revision 171164)
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009792.html">[Mageia-dev] [Bug 3431] ffmpeg security update to version 0.7.8
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9854">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9854">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9854">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9854">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 26.11.2011 16:47, Thomas Backlund wrote:
&gt;<i> 26.11.2011 16:15, Anssi Hannula skrev:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 26.11.2011 09:54, zezinho wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 02:31:43, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> About 75% of the crash issues fixed by the above 0.7 commits affect
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> mga1
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> 0.6.x, with a sample size of 70 commits.
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> So maybe we should consider ffmpeg as Firefox : a software we must
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> upgrade
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> because upstream fixes security only in latest version.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Unfortunately FFmpeg is much less 'stable' than firefox in both its
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> dependencies and API across different series. Meaning that upgrade of
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> FFmpeg often requires upgrade of libx264 (like in 0.6-&gt;0.7), or requires
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> changes in software that uses FFmpeg (0.6-&gt;0.7 doesn't, however).
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The &quot;easy&quot; way out in this case could be upgrading FFmpeg 0.6-&gt;0.7 and
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> x264 and doing extensive Q&amp;A to avoid breakage. The &quot;hard&quot; way is
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> backporting the ~200 relevant patches (most of which don't apply
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> automatically).
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> And you dont think upgrading to a new ffmpeg will bring new bugs and
</I>&gt;<i> need for new fixes...
</I>
Hence the quotes around &quot;easy&quot; and &quot;hard&quot;.

&gt;<i> We dont even have BR about those bugs in our bugzilla, so apparently
</I>&gt;<i> they are not that important or not easy to hit.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> The real easy way is: just apply the 5 security fixes and be done with it.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Updates_policy">https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Updates_policy</A>
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;For the most part, an update should consist of a patched build of the
</I>&gt;<i> same version of the package released with the distribution&quot;
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> If we start the &quot;look at upstream, there are X number of fixes not in
</I>&gt;<i> our package&quot;, where does it end ??
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> We will soon have to do it for every package, and that is Cauldron or a
</I>&gt;<i> rolling release, not really a stable release.
</I>
Obviously only security fixes are relevant.

&gt;<i> And we dont have the manpower in QA to start a updating frenzy like this.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> The point is simple: software _always_ have bugs. Thats a fact.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> upgrading from one version to another does not only &quot;fix bugs&quot;,
</I>&gt;<i> it's also &quot;replacing old bugs&quot; with &quot;new ones&quot;
</I>
(BTW, I wasn't advocating upgrading FFmpeg 0.6-&gt;0.7, though admittedly
my post was badly worded so it might've looked like I was)

-- 
Anssi Hannula
</PRE>















<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009850.html">[Mageia-dev] ffmpeg in mageia1 updates testing (revision 171164)
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009792.html">[Mageia-dev] [Bug 3431] ffmpeg security update to version 0.7.8
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9854">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9854">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9854">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9854">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>