1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC3A5C2.7070608%40gmx.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009581.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="009584.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
<B>Kamil Rytarowski</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EC3A5C2.7070608%40gmx.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">n54 at gmx.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Nov 16 13:00:02 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009581.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009584.html">[Mageia-dev] Fresh install hangs during boot since yesterday
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9582">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9582">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9582">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9582">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 16.11.2011 12:53, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
><i> On 16.11.2011 06:44, Buchan Milne wrote:
</I>>><i> On Wednesday, 16 November 2011 05:30:05 Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
</I>>>><i> On 14.11.2011 14:53, Buchan Milne wrote:
</I>>>>>>><i> ( and given the discussion
</I>>>>>>><i>
</I>>>>>>><i> on ml, it should be soon )
</I>>>>>><i> When I ask the developers, they don't know if qemu will include the
</I>>>>>><i> patch at all and when (now or after one year) and they suggested
</I>>>>>><i> to do
</I>>>>>><i> the openSUSE way (today the most recommended and full featured Linux
</I>>>>>><i> distro for GNS3).
</I>>>>><i> [...]
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>>>>><i> OK. So if gns3 can't be fixed for the stable - than should be removed
</I>>>>>><i> from the repos (for ISOs is to late).
</I>>>>>><i>
</I>>>>>><i> If we don't provide qemu patch, then gns3 should be removed from
</I>>>>>><i> Cauldron as well.
</I>>>>>><i>
</I>>>>>><i> I believe removing GNS3 is better than keeping it broken and..
</I>>>>>><i> irritate
</I>>>>>><i> people (I don't count the opinion of our quality). Later some 3rd
</I>>>>>><i> party
</I>>>>>><i> repos can provide GNS3 and its dependencies.
</I>>>>><i> You seem to imply that the only use of GNS3 is with this qemu patch.
</I>>>><i> It's possible to simulate and play without qemu.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> It should be "Suggested" by GNS3, but then what is the idea of
</I>>>><i> suggesting qemu that isn't working at all? I simply don't know why to
</I>>>><i> distribute a program that provides support in GUI for something that's
</I>>>><i> not working.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>><i> Uh, because you can use GNS3 for a lot of things without qemu.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> I used it for simulating a 4-router network with just dynamips.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> So, either I don't understand what you are trying to achieve, or why
</I>>><i> you want
</I>>><i> to *prevent* people from emulating routers with GNS3.
</I>><i> If I do *import* dynamips into Mageia then I want to *prevent* people
</I>><i> from emulating? No, I want to distribute fullfeatured software, where
</I>><i> everything is *well-rounded* - and not *missing*/*broken*.
</I>And providing it via 3rd party repo as fullfeatured is much better than
via official resources but limited. Is this also preventing? If someone
will need it, then will find information how to use GNS3 with Mageia.
>><i> Regards,
</I>>><i> Buchan
</I>><i>
</I>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009581.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009584.html">[Mageia-dev] Fresh install hangs during boot since yesterday
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9582">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9582">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9582">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9582">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
