1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%09move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201111141547.45420.bgmilne%40staff.telkomsa.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009588.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="009573.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
<B>Buchan Milne</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%09move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201111141547.45420.bgmilne%40staff.telkomsa.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Nov 14 14:47:44 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009588.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009573.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9521">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9521">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9521">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9521">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Saturday, 12 November 2011 22:11:31 Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
><i> On 12.11.2011 20:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
</I>><i> > Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 à 16:44 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
</I>><i> >> There is also one important patch missed in Mageia -
</I>><i> >> <A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html</A> it's
</I>><i> >> dependency for the GNS3 simulator. OpenSUSE already includes it
</I>><i> >> <A HREF="https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3">https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3</A>
</I>><i> >> ATools
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> If nobody is against I will do it and contact the maintainer (misc).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > I prefer to wait on the stable release ( ie, no rc1 ).
</I>><i> > We will wait on stable version of qemu.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> OK
</I>><i>
</I>><i> > And no patch unless it comes from upstream ( and even, I am not keen on
</I>><i> > backporting feature, better wait for stable release ).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> GNS3 is already in stable! This package is broken - no dynamips (=no
</I>><i> router emulation at all...),
</I>
Well, for me, I upgraded from Mandriva, and AFAIK there has been no new
release of dynamips in the past year => grab the package from Mandriva for
nwo, and log an enhancement bug (you can assign to me) for dynamips.
><i> no patched qemu (no virtualization support
</I>><i> at all...) According to the developers and their online documentation
</I>><i> for package maintainers <A HREF="http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html">http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html</A> UDP patched
</I>><i> Qemu is dependency/very important.
</I>
Can you provide a bit more information on what GNS3 feature needs this patched
qemu? I have in the past hooked up my kvm VMs to dynamips routers (before
GNS3).
Is this for Pix emulation, or just for launching generic virtual
machines/emulated hardware as part of your lab?
I really don't think the Pix emulation (I have never seen a maintained patch)
is ready for anyone to include it ... but I haven't looked recently.
><i>
</I>><i> We must fix the package and provide at least not so heavy broken ones...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I've prepared new version of GNS3, included into svn dynamips
</I>
Did you base it on the existing Mandriva package?
><i> and
</I>><i> xdotool (this one suggested) - these I can maintain with my mentor, so I
</I>><i> ask for patch qemu in stable versus UDP support.
</I>
Regards,
Buchan
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009588.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009573.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9521">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9521">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9521">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9521">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
