zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009503.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EBED2F3.1030309%40gmx.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="009502.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="009506.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
    <B>Kamil Rytarowski</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4EBED2F3.1030309%40gmx.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">n54 at gmx.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sat Nov 12 21:11:31 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009502.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009506.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9503">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9503">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9503">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9503">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 12.11.2011 20:20, Michael Scherer wrote:
&gt;<i> Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 &#224; 16:44 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> There is also one important patch missed in Mageia -
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html</A> it's
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> dependency for the GNS3 simulator. OpenSUSE already includes it
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&amp;project=openSUSE%3ATools">https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&amp;project=openSUSE%3ATools</A>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> If nobody is against I will do it and contact the maintainer (misc).
</I>&gt;<i> I prefer to wait on the stable release ( ie, no rc1 ).
</I>&gt;<i> We will wait on stable version of qemu.
</I>OK
&gt;<i> And no patch unless it comes from upstream ( and even, I am not keen on
</I>&gt;<i> backporting feature, better wait for stable release ).
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>GNS3 is already in stable! This package is broken - no dynamips (=no 
router emulation at all...), no patched qemu (no virtualization support 
at all...) According to the developers and their online documentation 
for package maintainers <A HREF="http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html">http://forum.gns3.net/post11571.html</A> UDP patched 
Qemu is dependency/very important.

We must fix the package and provide at least not so heavy broken ones...

I've prepared new version of GNS3, included into svn dynamips and 
xdotool (this one suggested) - these I can maintain with my mentor, so I 
ask for patch qemu in stable versus UDP support.

Regards

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009502.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009506.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9503">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9503">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9503">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9503">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>