blob: f0118303f93ac50e5c5a57e8d10a74f3ba85d4d0 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1321125626.14147.2.camel%40localhost%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009501.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="009503.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1321125626.14147.2.camel%40localhost%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Nov 12 20:20:26 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009501.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009503.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9502">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9502">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9502">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9502">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 à 16:44 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
><i> There is also one important patch missed in Mageia -
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-11/msg00787.html</A> it's
</I>><i> dependency for the GNS3 simulator. OpenSUSE already includes it
</I>><i> <A HREF="https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3ATools">https://build.opensuse.org/package/files?package=qemu&project=openSUSE%3ATools</A>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> If nobody is against I will do it and contact the maintainer (misc).
</I>
I prefer to wait on the stable release ( ie, no rc1 ).
We will wait on stable version of qemu.
And no patch unless it comes from upstream ( and even, I am not keen on
backporting feature, better wait for stable release ).
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009501.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009503.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#9502">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#9502">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#9502">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#9502">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
