summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009267.html
blob: 49ee88b598e1105d28fd4f896186670d608d2d34 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Review%20Of%20Bugs&In-Reply-To=%3C201111010815.43121.alien%40rmail.be%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="009262.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="009269.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs</H1>
    <B>Maarten Vanraes</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Review%20Of%20Bugs&In-Reply-To=%3C201111010815.43121.alien%40rmail.be%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs">alien at rmail.be
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Nov  1 08:15:43 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009262.html">[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009269.html">[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9267">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9267">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9267">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9267">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op dinsdag 01 november 2011 00:32:38 schreef Michael Scherer:
[... stuff ...]
So this mean it's preferred, that for example:

- I grab mysql and httpd
- I do as i see fit
- contributions to httpd (which happen), will have to ask me before doing it.
- since i only wanted to help, i may do a bad job of maintaining it, ie: not 
enough fixes, don't respond to others who want to patch httpd, etc...
- perhaps i only care about stable and don't do anything on cauldron
- i could change apache layout for cauldron to debian-style, which i think is 
better.

etc...

Personally, i think it's better that it gets done properly. having such a big 
responsibility is a pretty big point...

but otoh, i don't have a better idea...

Regards,

AL13N

PS: as a side note, devs of /soft stuff should also be their packagers and 
maintainers; it seems so weird that eg: mgaonline doesn't have a maintainer? 
when it's arguably the most visible package of mageia itself?
(as an example, i wrote urpmi-proxy and plasma-applet-launchbutton and i am 
listed as maintainer for it as well)

PPS: or perhaps a dev team should be formed and that team leader could be 
listed as maintainer of all dev packages that are now in nobody. and the 
people working on packages in /soft could be in the dev team...

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009262.html">[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009269.html">[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9267">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9267">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9267">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9267">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>