1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C4DF77B3A.2040607%40gmx.de%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005629.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="005632.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1>
<B>Thorsten van Lil</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C4DF77B3A.2040607%40gmx.de%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">tvl83 at gmx.de
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Jun 14 17:16:10 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005629.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005632.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5631">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5631">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5631">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5631">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Am 14.06.2011 17:02, schrieb Anne nicolas:
>><i> I do not understand what people are saying about backports being
</I>>><i> "unsupported". IMHO we should either have backports that are
</I>>><i> supported, with fixes for security issues and important bugs, or no
</I>>><i> backports.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was
</I>><i> explicitely said to be unsupported. "Use it at your own risks"
</I>
Exactly. If we don't restrict the use of backports on once own risk, I'm
at least totally happy with it :)
Greetings,
Thorsten
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005629.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005632.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5631">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5631">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5631">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5631">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
