1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1106141652510.2736%40zem.cjw.nep%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005621.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="005629.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1>
<B>Christiaan Welvaart</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1106141652510.2736%40zem.cjw.nep%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">cjw at daneel.dyndns.org
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Jun 14 16:59:52 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005621.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005629.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5628">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5628">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5628">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5628">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
><i> I don't want a full rolling release, because of the listed disadvantages. So,
</I>><i> if you ask me what is "wrong" with Arch, I would say:
</I>><i> * due to the rolling release, it's nearly vanilla. This doesn't match
</I>><i> requirements of Mageia
</I>><i> * no innovations (because of vanilla)
</I>><i> * a rolling core system has a negative correlation with it's stability
</I>><i> * heavy work load
</I>><i> * ...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So, I don't ask for a copy of Arch nor any other distribution. I asked
</I>><i> (although it wasn't my idea) for something new. An compromise: a light
</I>><i> rolling release.
</I>
This is exactly what release + updates + backports can be, the only
requirement is enough people to do the work. I do not understand what
people are saying about backports being "unsupported". IMHO we should
either have backports that are supported, with fixes for security issues
and important bugs, or no backports.
Christiaan
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005621.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005629.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#5628">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#5628">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#5628">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#5628">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
