summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005481.html
blob: 2fdcee3e64daec84b1078cdafe8d93317678d949 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C31139.42432.qm%40web161710.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="005478.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="005506.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1>
    <B>Radu-Cristian FOTESCU</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C31139.42432.qm%40web161710.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">beranger5ca at yahoo.ca
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Jun 13 13:16:22 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005478.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005506.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5481">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5481">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5481">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5481">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>&gt;<i> Unstable branch - absolute latest software here...
</I>&gt;<i> Rolling unstable - Still risky but not on the lines of unstable
</I>&gt;<i> Rolling stable - everyday use and very stable 
</I>
May I add my bit of unrequested thoughts?

This discussion seems to only differentiate between &quot;degrees of unstability and risks&quot;, but nothing about &quot;user roles&quot;. 
IMHO, a distro is not only about &quot;risk vs. features&quot;, but also about what people are expecting from it.

I could imagine for user roles:

&quot;rolling-user&quot; branch: 
-- KDE4, GNOME3, XFCE, LibreOffice, Firefox/Thunderbird, Chromium are always kept to the latest _stable_ (not development) version;
-- other applications might be kept (or not) to the latest _stable_ (not development) version; 
-- other libraries are to be upgraded _only_ if they're required by newer applications.

&quot;rolling-user-risky&quot; branch: 
-- KDE4, GNOME3, XFCE, LibreOffice, Firefox/Thunderbird, Chromium are always kept to the latest _development_/_unstable_ version;
-- other applications might be kept to the latest _development_/_unstable_ version, otherwise most are kept to the latest _stable_ version; 
-- other libraries are to be upgraded _only_ as they're required by newer applications.

&quot;rolling-developer&quot; branch: 
-- everything updated to the latest _development_/_unstable_ versions of everything.

Does this make any sense?

Best regards,
R-C (aka Beranger with an e acute)
</PRE>


























































































































































































































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005478.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005506.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5481">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5481">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5481">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5481">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>