summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005474.html
blob: 46dac93f6b7feb54acbe41cdcb0c5a84eb1be1c9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev]  Release cycles proposals, and discussion
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C618105.16338.qm%40web161314.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="005796.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="005475.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev]  Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1>
    <B>Ron</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C618105.16338.qm%40web161314.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev]  Release cycles proposals, and discussion">corbintechboy at yahoo.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Jun 13 12:07:38 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005796.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005475.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5474">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5474">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5474">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5474">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>I made another post in a different thread about the way I feel the release cycle should go. After more thinking I do think that I really have the right idea and here is why...
Going the route of release cycles really does not make this distribution fit into anything. You going to try and appeal to new people? Ubuntu has that&#160;covered and you will never steal that role. Hoping to become a geek type distro? There are many that have that covered.&#160;
The best thing you can do as a team is try to come up with something that makes you stand apart from the crowd. I never understood the release cycle model anyhow, whats the goal of that? To show off the latest tech in the open source world? Really? With Slackware and Fedora and Suse and hosts of other flavors of GNU/Linux all doing the same thing?
What do we have that others don't? We have something new that can be great if planned right. There are 100's of distros releasing in cycles, let's get out of that and truly showcase the best of open source through:
Unstable branch - absolute latest software here...Rolling unstable - Still risky but not on the lines of unstableRolling stable - everyday use and very stable&#160;
You could throw in &quot;snapshots&quot; and support those for X amount of time as I have posted in the other place if you wanted (based on rolling unstable). You could also have LTS releases based on Rolling stable.... It's up to you.
I don't&#160;believe we need yet another &quot;burn new disk every X months for????&quot; distribution.&#160;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110613/e6448a8c/attachment.html&gt;
</PRE>





























































































































































































































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005796.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005475.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5474">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5474">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5474">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5474">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>