1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20gstreamer%20packaging%20too%20split%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAJmd%2BxqTa%3DvEHN4%2BJuW4cpky%2BN4huy69MBc8bNbYo0c2bg8rWw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006406.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="006422.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?</H1>
<B>Ahmad Samir</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20gstreamer%20packaging%20too%20split%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAJmd%2BxqTa%3DvEHN4%2BJuW4cpky%2BN4huy69MBc8bNbYo0c2bg8rWw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?">ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Jul 6 15:23:25 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006406.html">[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006422.html">[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6410">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6410">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6410">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6410">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 6 July 2011 15:09, Christiaan Welvaart <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">cjw at daneel.dyndns.org</A>> wrote:
><i> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> Yeah it is a bit of a grab-bag of stuff, but again, should we still just
</I>>><i> bundle everything together anyway and sod the extra disk space needed?
</I>>><i> It would be a lot simpler for users ("oh you need $foo? sure, just
</I>>><i> installed -ugly/-bad") which is advise they can get direct from upstream
</I>>><i> without having to know our particular packaging quirks.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> As someone who does upstream support for other projects, it's a pain to
</I>>><i> put caveats in all your advice for distros you don't know.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> That said, the trade off may be too much, hence the canvassing of
</I>>><i> opinions here :)
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I think there are only 2 solutions:
</I>><i> - Add a meta package, e.g. gstreamer-codecs-all that can be used to make
</I>><i>  sure all available codecs are installed. Some people complain about
</I>><i>  "bad" and "ugly" so using those names more is not a good idea.
</I>
But that's how upstream calls them, hiding them won't work, since
they're too popular already.
FWIW, there's gstreamer0.10-decoders, a meta package in mdv (not
imported yet in Mageia).
><i> - Use the packagekit gstreamer plugin, so players install the correct
</I>><i>  plugins on demand.
</I>><i>
</I>
ATM it doesn't work, the urpmi backend needs some love..
><i>
</I>><i>    Christiaan
</I>><i>
</I>
--
Ahmad Samir
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006406.html">[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006422.html">[Mageia-dev] gstreamer packaging too split?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6410">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6410">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6410">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6410">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
