blob: 0a1eaf871d66fa279cd71d50e9c6e894875db392 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFP%3A%20commenting%20obsoletes%20for%20later%20removal&In-Reply-To=%3C201112171413.36428.alien%40rmail.be%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010609.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="010569.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal</H1>
<B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFP%3A%20commenting%20obsoletes%20for%20later%20removal&In-Reply-To=%3C201112171413.36428.alien%40rmail.be%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Dec 17 14:13:36 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010609.html">[Mageia-dev] mariadb
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010569.html">[Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10567">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10567">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10567">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10567">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi all,
Annsi, misc and myself were discussing obsoletes, and i think we should make a
policy for a structured comment, so that later (in some timeperiod that's as
of yet unspecified) we can remove older obsoletes in a structured way.
I propose we put a comment in the spec file, with the version the package will
be first used, so likely that is cauldron, so example:
# Obsoletes: mga2
(before the obsolete line)
if noone objects, we can put the policy on the wiki somewhere
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010609.html">[Mageia-dev] mariadb
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010569.html">[Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10567">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10567">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10567">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10567">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
