1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20adoption%20campaign%2C%203%20months%20later&In-Reply-To=%3C1323905285.5959.6.camel%40vosdook%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010453.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="010462.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later</H1>
<B>Manuel Hiebel</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20adoption%20campaign%2C%203%20months%20later&In-Reply-To=%3C1323905285.5959.6.camel%40vosdook%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later">manuel at hiebel.eu
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Dec 15 00:28:05 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010453.html">[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010462.html">[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10455">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10455">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10455">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10455">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le jeudi 15 décembre 2011 à 00:14 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
><i> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > So let's try to make a proposal, if there is a list, after how many
</I>><i> > months should a package be removed from the repository if not maintained
</I>><i> > ( and by maintained, I do not say "not changes or anything", I really
</I>><i> > mean "no one listed as maintainer" ) ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> In my opinion, what we should remove is packages that have important
</I>><i> bugs not fixed for a long time. If a package has no official maintainer
</I>><i> listed, but has all its bugs fixed quickly, I see no reason to remove it.
</I>><i>
</I>And what to do with package that have a maintainer, but the packager
does not fix the bugs or is inactive ? :D
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010453.html">[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010462.html">[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#10455">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#10455">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#10455">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#10455">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
