1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3C20101222202539.GB17809%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001844.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001864.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla</H1>
<B>Michael scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3C20101222202539.GB17809%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Dec 22 21:25:39 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001844.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001864.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1857">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1857">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1857">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1857">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Frederic Janssens wrote:
><i> On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a écrit :
</I>><i> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >> > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
</I>><i> >> > > I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla
</I>><i> >> > > really soon
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >> > So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have :
</I>><i> >> > - products
</I>><i> >> > - component, contained in products
</I>><i> >> > - and various field, per bug,
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >> > and the way we organize everything will impact the layout.
</I>><i> >> >
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> Yes.
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the
</I>><i> >> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla, I have been testing
</I>><i> >> <A HREF="http://bugs.mageia.org/">http://bugs.mageia.org/</A> .
</I>><i> >> Xmlrpc works, but it will be necessary to configure additional fields.
</I>><i> >> The minimum would be to add an 'RPM Package' field (such as exists on
</I>><i> >> <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/">https://qa.mandriva.com/</A>).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > What about component not related to rpm ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> The 'RPM Package' field would be left blank.
</I>><i> (usually many fields are left blank)
</I>
That's quite useless clutter in this case :/
><i> >
</I>><i> > And do you mean srpm or rpm ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> On <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/">https://qa.mandriva.com/</A> anything goes.
</I>><i> To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
</I>><i> The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
</I>><i> as far as I know that would be :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> name-version-release
</I>><i>
</I>><i> unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> name-version-release.architecture
</I>
There is already a "architecture" field, afaik, as well as a version field,
no ?
( I didn't check as I refuse to enter my password over a insecured http session ).
And I think that giving rpm ( and not srpm ) will make search a little bit complex
in some corner cases ( can will also cause problem for the next point ).
><i> >
</I>><i> > We should also take in account package naming change.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> which change?
</I>
Well, when a rpm change name, rename it in the field to be the new name, so not all bugs
are lost.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001844.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001864.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1857">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1857">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1857">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1857">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
