1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101211134100.GA32305%40maude.comedia.it%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001706.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001712.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
<B>Luca Berra</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C20101211134100.GA32305%40maude.comedia.it%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">bluca at vodka.it
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Dec 11 14:41:00 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001706.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001712.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1709">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1709">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1709">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1709">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
><i>Thinking of PLF, "MLF" comes to mind but that abbreviation has another
</I>><i>well-known meaning. :) "pisc" (patented in some countries) is another
</I>what i particulary like about the plf name is the "liberation" word,
which has a clear positive meaning.
every other suggestions in this thread has a negative connotation
'tainted', 'swamp', etc.
Wording should not convey the meaning that it is illegal, thus _wrong_
to use this kind of software.
Wording should convey the meaning that using this kind of software is a
way to express personal freedom without really committing any _wrong_.
I would really hate if a free software distribution fell in the trap of
supporting the idea that software patents are _right_.
L.
--
Luca Berra -- <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">bluca at vodka.it</A>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001706.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001712.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1709">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1709">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1709">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1709">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
