blob: bd473e3bfbd15baceb2d158535afa8cad1bb2538 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D021515.70209%40iki.fi%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001681.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001683.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout</H1>
<B>Anssi Hannula</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3C4D021515.70209%40iki.fi%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout">anssi.hannula at iki.fi
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Dec 10 12:55:01 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001681.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001683.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1682">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1682">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1682">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1682">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Just some smallish notes regarding other distros..
On 10.12.2010 12:22, andre999 wrote:
><i> Debian uses the same names main, contrib, non-free, with explicit policy
</I>><i> close to Mandriva practices.
</I>><i> In the same policy page, they say that patent-contrained software goes
</I>><i> into non-free, then further down they say that it can be excluded.
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html">http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html</A>
</I>
Interesting.. this doesn't seem to correspond to reality (they have e.g.
ffmpeg with patent-constrained codecs enabled).
[...]
><i> Fedora package acceptance policy is explicitly dictated by RedHat.
</I>><i> Includes only free packages (thus excluding redistributable drivers),
</I>><i> plus excludes legally constrained packages.
</I>><i> Fedora is the only distro reviewed here which does not accept non-free
</I>><i> packages.
</I>
They allow non-free firmware:
<A HREF="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Binary_Firmware</A>
><i> However, given that RedHat sells their versions of Linux (with support),
</I>><i> one could question the motivation of the Fedora policy.
</I>
--
Anssi Hannula
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001681.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001683.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1682">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1682">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1682">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1682">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|