1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Support policy
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Support%20policy&In-Reply-To=%3C201011301632.33125.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001557.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001559.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Support policy</H1>
<B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Support%20policy&In-Reply-To=%3C201011301632.33125.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Support policy">stormi at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Nov 30 16:32:33 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001557.html">[Mageia-dev] Support policy
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001559.html">[Mageia-dev] Support policy
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1558">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1558">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1558">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1558">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>
Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 16:13:25, Michael Scherer a écrit :
><i>
</I>><i> Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:31 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
</I>><i> > Hi,
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > I would like to discuss the support policy for Mageia.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > It would be interesting to know (or decide) where Mageia is heading, given our limited resources :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> can you first explain what are our ressources so you can explain how
</I>><i> limited you think they are ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> So to me, the goal should be first to aim for quality, and then add more
</I>><i> packages, as I said, in a sustainable way ( ie no mass import without
</I>><i> being first sure that we can manage them, no rotting rpms because people
</I>><i> no longer care ).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Which mean option 1.
</I>
I may have mistaken, but from what I understood, you explained us why option 1 is better than option 2, which is what I already said in my post.
So why not option 3, which in my opinion is even better than option 1, because :
- every package must have a maintainer like in option 1
- QA Team focuses on a subset to provide even better support for them
Regards
Samuel
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001557.html">[Mageia-dev] Support policy
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001559.html">[Mageia-dev] Support policy
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1558">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1558">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1558">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1558">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
