zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000987.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010071355.09586.oliver.bgr%40googlemail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000985.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000996.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>Oliver Burger</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010071355.09586.oliver.bgr%40googlemail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">oliver.bgr at googlemail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Oct  7 13:55:09 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000985.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000996.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#987">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#987">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#987">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#987">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Marc Par&#233; &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">marc at marcpare.com</A>&gt; schrieb am 2010-10-07
&gt;<i> I have to say though, that after having browsed through the Mdv2010.1
</I>&gt;<i> backports by hand, there is a lot, from a user point of view, that would
</I>&gt;<i> interest users. All of the sexy upgrades to software are there.
</I>I have been using the backports as regular repos for years now and some 
(solvable) version conflicts with kernel modules put aside, I never had any 
problems with them.

&gt;<i> I think it would be nice to keep as long as it didn't cause major
</I>&gt;<i> problems with the installation. Maybe an option to &quot;roll-back&quot; a
</I>&gt;<i> software update would be something to consider for users?
</I>That would be a nice feature for urpmi. But it's only useful in certain 
borders. Sometimes newer versions are changing things about the configuration 
in the user's HOME, the older versions can't work with. So there will be 
problems with some packages if you do a &quot;rollback upgrade&quot;.

Oliver
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000985.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000996.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#987">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#987">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#987">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#987">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>