summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000942.html
blob: 3c08b2125ead9780740b75fc8ceab69142045604 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAD2E2D.6010801%40laposte.net%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000956.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000943.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>andr&#233;</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAD2E2D.6010801%40laposte.net%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">andr55 at laposte.net
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Oct  7 04:19:25 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000956.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000943.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#942">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#942">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#942">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#942">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Tux99 a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>    
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 5 October 2010 15:28, Tux99&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tux99-mga at uridium.org</A>&gt;  wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>      
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> This would reduce the space requirements on the mirrors and it would mean
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> that Mageia is a &quot;rolling distro&quot; for most apps, making it more attractive
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> compared to ubuntu/Fedora/opensuse and at the same time reduce the workload
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> for packagers.
</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>        
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> No. No space would be saved.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> package foobar-1.1-2mdv2010.1 and foobar-1.1-2mdv2011.0 are _NOT_ the same
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> They'll end in different files (different sizes&amp;  checksums) b/c:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - different ENVR
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - different build environement (build against libc+libboo+... of
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 2010.1&amp;  2011.1 respectively)
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>      
</I>&gt;<i> That's not what i meant, I meant this:
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> This is how mandriva currently does it:
</I>&gt;<i> release/foobar-1.1-1mga2010.1
</I>&gt;<i> updates/foobar-1.1-2mga2010.1
</I>&gt;<i> backports/foobar-1.2-1mga2010.1
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> This is how it would be:
</I>&gt;<i> release/foobar-1.1-1mga2010.1
</I>&gt;<i> updates/foobar-1.2-1mga2010.1
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Basically you drop the backported patch in updates (like I said
</I>&gt;<i> earlier, this would only be for apps that don't have child dependencies
</I>&gt;<i> and where the new release is not a major new release, just an
</I>&gt;<i> incremental release, or at least where it's an evolution not a major
</I>&gt;<i> rewrite).
</I>&gt;<i>    
</I>So you are saying that the same package, with exactly the same name, is 
put into updates and backports.  Are you sure there wouldn't be a hard 
link between the 2 files ?  If not, it wouldn't be difficult.
However, wouldn't it be more likely that the backport would be for an 
earlier release, with dependancies corresponding to the libraries, etc 
of the earlier release ?
In the first case, no saving of space.  In the second, additional 
libraries, etc would probably have to be installed, which could be a 
stability nightmare, as well as saving relatively little space.

- Andr&#233; (andre999)
</PRE>









































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000956.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000943.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#942">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#942">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#942">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#942">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>