1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci8j4i3%24gd2%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000934.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000924.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>Marc Paré</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci8j4i3%24gd2%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">marc at marcpare.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Oct 7 02:34:10 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000934.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000924.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#933">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#933">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#933">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#933">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 2010-10-06 20:02, vfmBOFH a écrit :
><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> 2010/10/7 Marc Paré <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">marc at marcpare.com</A>
</I>><i> <mailto:<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">marc at marcpare.com</A>>>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Le 2010-10-06 17:10, vfmBOFH a écrit :
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> 2010/10/1 atilla ontas
</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>
</I>><i> <mailto:<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>>
</I>><i> <mailto:<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>
</I>><i> <mailto:<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>>>>
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle
</I>><i> model. Every
</I>><i> 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we
</I>><i> should
</I>><i> make one release in one year. By doing so devs and
</I>><i> translators won't
</I>><i> be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like
</I>><i> systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more
</I>><i> mature in a
</I>><i> year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese
</I>><i> mirrors
</I>><i> space waste.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming
</I>><i> scheme? I.e. do
</I>><i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming
</I>><i> scheme and
</I>><i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0
</I>><i> or using
</I>><i> code names.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> What's your opinion?
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Hi all.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community
</I>><i> what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active
</I>><i> until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about
</I>><i> community preferences.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so
</I>><i> we must
</I>><i> be stay in touch about their preferences.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Cheers
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Where is the survey?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Marc
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Sorry, the word is "poll" :P
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Blogdrake is the mandriva's oficial spanish-spoken forum.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> You can find the poll at the frontpage: <A HREF="http://blogdrake.net">http://blogdrake.net</A>
</I>
IMHO, I think such a poll could be mis-leading as it supposes that users
will have experienced "rolling releases", "light rolling release", "LTS"
and the Mandriva "update/upgrade". If enough people vote, the vote will
show the Mandriva way as being preferred as, again, most users do not
have that much experience in different upgrade/update methods. It will
be a closer result if fewer people take part in it.
I think the distro dev's would be in a better position to explain the
pro's and con's of these different types and explain to we users the
amount of work/development time needed to maintain these.
Marc
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000934.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000924.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#933">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#933">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#933">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#933">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
