zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000921.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTinv1nQv%2BUXLjyBQxcs2r0DV3zBJUDgA0OfCZD8c%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000920.html">
   
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>vfmBOFH</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTinv1nQv%2BUXLjyBQxcs2r0DV3zBJUDgA0OfCZD8c%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">vfmbofh at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Wed Oct  6 23:10:20 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000920.html">[Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets
</A></li>
        
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#921">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#921">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#921">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#921">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2010/10/1 atilla ontas &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tarakbumba at gmail.com</A>&gt;

&gt;<i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every
</I>&gt;<i> 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should
</I>&gt;<i> make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't
</I>&gt;<i> be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like
</I>&gt;<i> systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a
</I>&gt;<i> year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors
</I>&gt;<i> space waste.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
</I>&gt;<i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
</I>&gt;<i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
</I>&gt;<i> code names.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> What's your opinion?
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
Hi all.

At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community  what
kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the
weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community
preferences.

We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be
stay in touch about their preferences.

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment-0001.html&gt;
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000920.html">[Mageia-dev] Identifying Target Markets
</A></li>
	
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#921">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#921">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#921">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#921">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>