blob: d036f34c55ed5f1a783932a52e7bd8bd30fdd9e6 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CACC4D8.5020001%40free.fr%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000911.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000908.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>Cassian Braconnnier</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4CACC4D8.5020001%40free.fr%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">ptyxs at free.fr
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 6 20:50:00 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000911.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000908.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#912">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#912">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#912">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#912">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 06/10/2010 20:31, Michael Scherer a écrit :
><i> Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 14:55 -0300, Gustavo Giampaoli a écrit :
</I>><i>
</I>>>>><i> So a one year release cycle with lots of app backports (and maybe a kernel
</I>>>>><i> backport mid-cycle if there is important new hardware support) is IMHO the
</I>>>>><i> best release cycle for 'normal' users.
</I>>>>><i>
</I>>><i> Just take a look to Windows XP users. Almost 10 years of bugfixes and
</I>>><i> patches almost without any mayor change in the OS. But XP is still on
</I>>><i> the road. And it's because you can have the latest software "and"
</I>>><i> hardware in your ten years old OS.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> I'm not saying that Mageia should last ten years. But IMHO that "XP
</I>>><i> case" is a valid example.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i> Sure, when we will have the money of Microsoft, and the team they have
</I>><i> for QA, I am sure we will be able to do it too...
</I>Precisely for that latter reason a fork was not a good idea, in my
opinion : better fuse, merge, unite with other distros than create new
little projects...
(sorry, I am going out immediately...)
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000911.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000908.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#912">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#912">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#912">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#912">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
