blob: 283d13c06e398cea2e452f801ca8a53e8bcb519c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikyn-R6igN4AKXu%3Dsbh9iBvA47NTyLFRnpXr33t%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000907.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000911.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>Gustavo Giampaoli</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikyn-R6igN4AKXu%3Dsbh9iBvA47NTyLFRnpXr33t%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">giampaoli.gustavo at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 6 19:55:06 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000907.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000911.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#909">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#909">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#909">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#909">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>>><i> So a one year release cycle with lots of app backports (and maybe a kernel
</I>>><i> backport mid-cycle if there is important new hardware support) is IMHO the
</I>>><i> best release cycle for 'normal' users.
</I>
Just take a look to Windows XP users. Almost 10 years of bugfixes and
patches almost without any mayor change in the OS. But XP is still on
the road. And it's because you can have the latest software "and"
hardware in your ten years old OS.
I'm not saying that Mageia should last ten years. But IMHO that "XP
case" is a valid example.
Cheers!
Gustavo Giampaoli (aka tavillo1980)
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000907.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000911.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#909">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#909">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#909">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#909">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
