1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTin_ptSJSvphJdS-zRC0tj1Av166vWLMn7nG7ngc%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000903.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000905.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>R James</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTin_ptSJSvphJdS-zRC0tj1Av166vWLMn7nG7ngc%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">upsnag2 at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 6 19:10:48 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000903.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000905.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#904">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#904">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#904">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#904">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>> wrote:
><i> Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 18:42 +0200, Olivier Thauvin a écrit :
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long
</I>>><i> life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.
</I>>><i> (X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers
</I>>><i> oriented or enterprise).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Well, we can do both, ie a long life, and optional backports ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> because alterning may be quite puzzling for people.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I would be in favor of some kind of LTS, like Ubuntu.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We cannot have all release with long life, not enough ressources, but
</I>><i> having one from time to time would be good. Except we first need to be
</I>><i> sure to be able to maintain a single release, so I would report this
</I>><i> project to 1 or 2 years in the future.
</I>><i>
</I>What is the typical deployment period for servers?
At the company where I work, they're leased for 3 years.
If that's the average, then perhaps 3-year LTS would be sufficient?
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000903.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000905.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#904">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#904">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#904">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#904">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
