1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1286383758.15513.243.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000902.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000904.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1286383758.15513.243.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Oct 6 18:49:18 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000902.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000904.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#903">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#903">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#903">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#903">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 18:42 +0200, Olivier Thauvin a écrit :
><i> So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long
</I>><i> life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.
</I>><i> (X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers
</I>><i> oriented or enterprise).
</I>
Well, we can do both, ie a long life, and optional backports ?
because alterning may be quite puzzling for people.
I would be in favor of some kind of LTS, like Ubuntu.
We cannot have all release with long life, not enough ressources, but
having one from time to time would be good. Except we first need to be
sure to be able to maintain a single release, so I would report this
project to 1 or 2 years in the future.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000902.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000904.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#903">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#903">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#903">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#903">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|