1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010051621.23729.omejean%40yahoo.fr%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000844.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000848.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
<B>Olivier Méjean</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010051621.23729.omejean%40yahoo.fr%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">omejean at yahoo.fr
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Oct 5 16:21:23 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000844.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000848.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#847">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#847">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#847">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#847">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le mardi 5 octobre 2010 15:47:20, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
><i> On 5 October 2010 15:28, Tux99 <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tux99-mga at uridium.org</A>> wrote:
</I>><i> > Personally I think the way Mandriva maintains both updates and backports
</I>><i> > for each release is a waste of resources.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> How is it a waste?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> A practical example is the college professor / school teacher (see
</I>><i> Fernando Parra post a few emails back); he doesn't want to upgrade the
</I>><i> boxes in the lab, he doesn't care if they have the newest/shiniest
</I>><i> versions, just that the distro is stable and works(tm). The same
</I>><i> applies for a company, servers... etc. We aren't talking only about
</I>><i> personal boxes that can break without too much drastic consequences.
</I>
No need to update. What on earth is that feeling that a rolling distro forces
users to update ?
><i>
</I>><i> > I do agree that Mageia should be a semi-rolling distro.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > By "semi rolling distro" I mean the following:
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Release a distro every 8-12 months (the exact cyle is not the point I'm
</I>><i> > debating here, it could be 6 months too, it doesn't mater for the concept
</I>><i> > I'm trying to explain).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Provide updates/security patches for all the basic stuff that has a lot
</I>><i> > of dependencies (kernel, core libs, kde, gnome, xorg, etc.).
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Provide newer release rather than backported security patches for all
</I>><i> > other apps.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > In other words, backports (rather than backported security fixes) should
</I>><i> > be the rule for everything apart from the core system stuff that has
</I>><i> > loads of dependencies.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > This would reduce the space requirements on the mirrors and it would mean
</I>><i> > that Mageia is a "rolling distro" for most apps, making it more
</I>><i> > attractive compared to ubuntu/Fedora/opensuse and at the same time reduce
</I>><i> > the workload for packagers.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Again a rolling distro is something that's not clearly defined. And to
</I>><i> be honest, a rolling distro isn't suitable for new or inexperienced
</I>><i> users. Simply because you can't guarantee that a new package won't
</I>><i> introduce regressions (or totally break an app), in this case an
</I>><i> experienced user will know how to revert to an older version, a new or
</I>><i> inexperienced user won't.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Look at the rolling distros that've been mentioned, Debian or Gentoo,
</I>><i> right? would anyone recommend Debian or Gentoo for a
</I>><i> new/inexperienced/non-power user?
</I>
PCLinuxOS is a rolling distro and is to inexperienced users.
Olivier
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000844.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000848.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#847">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#847">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#847">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#847">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
