summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html
blob: 610c09e6a398a25de015de32e0c22d43eda85d2d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTim-bguSu8_W2mRDZqgsuZD0ExFb4-Y%3D%3DHQ4pi_A%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000836.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000841.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>Ahmad Samir</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTim-bguSu8_W2mRDZqgsuZD0ExFb4-Y%3D%3DHQ4pi_A%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Oct  5 15:47:20 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000836.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000841.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#838">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#838">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#838">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#838">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 5 October 2010 15:28, Tux99 &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tux99-mga at uridium.org</A>&gt; wrote:
&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Personally I think the way Mandriva maintains both updates and backports
</I>&gt;<i> for each release is a waste of resources.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
How is it a waste?

A practical example is the college professor / school teacher (see
Fernando Parra post a few emails back); he doesn't want to upgrade the
boxes in the lab, he doesn't care if they have the newest/shiniest
versions, just that the distro is stable and works(tm). The same
applies for a company, servers... etc. We aren't talking only about
personal boxes that can break without too much drastic consequences.

&gt;<i> I do agree that Mageia should be a semi-rolling distro.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> By &quot;semi rolling distro&quot; I mean the following:
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Release a distro every 8-12 months (the exact cyle is not the point I'm
</I>&gt;<i> debating here, it could be 6 months too, it doesn't mater for the concept
</I>&gt;<i> I'm trying to explain).
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Provide updates/security patches for all the basic stuff that has a lot of
</I>&gt;<i> dependencies (kernel, core libs, kde, gnome, xorg, etc.).
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Provide newer release rather than backported security patches for all other
</I>&gt;<i> apps.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> In other words, backports (rather than backported security fixes) should be
</I>&gt;<i> the rule for everything apart from the core system stuff that has loads of
</I>&gt;<i> dependencies.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> This would reduce the space requirements on the mirrors and it would mean
</I>&gt;<i> that Mageia is a &quot;rolling distro&quot; for most apps, making it more attractive
</I>&gt;<i> compared to ubuntu/Fedora/opensuse and at the same time reduce the workload
</I>&gt;<i> for packagers.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
Again a rolling distro is something that's not clearly defined. And to
be honest, a rolling distro isn't suitable for new or inexperienced
users. Simply because you can't guarantee that a new package won't
introduce regressions (or totally break an app), in this case an
experienced user will know how to revert to an older version, a new or
inexperienced user won't.

Look at the rolling distros that've been mentioned, Debian or Gentoo,
right? would anyone recommend Debian or Gentoo for a
new/inexperienced/non-power user?

-- 
Ahmad Samir
</PRE>







<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000836.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000841.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#838">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#838">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#838">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#838">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>