summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000630.html
blob: c0e4262e44b8dee23d9dd5c270a3ecdd1937011e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010012241.59812.omejean%40yahoo.fr%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000623.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000631.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>Olivier M&#233;jean</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010012241.59812.omejean%40yahoo.fr%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">omejean at yahoo.fr
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Oct  1 22:41:59 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000623.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000631.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#630">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#630">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#630">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#630">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le vendredi 1 octobre 2010 21:38:14, nicolas vigier a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> On Fri, 01 Oct 2010, Olivier M&#233;jean wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; What about a rolling distribution ? As an user (just plain user) i do not
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; think that installing a distribution is a goal, just a mean to use my
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; computer, so i wish i could not spend time installing a distribution
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; every 6 months or every year.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> And you prefer to spend time to update your distribution every day instead
</I>&gt;<i> of every year ?
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>
I update my distribution if not every day every week each time there is an 
update, but moreover i need to update every 6 months if i want to have latest 
versions. So right now the point is updating every day and upgrading to new 
version every 6 months (and truely, i am still using 2010).

The question of time is a wrong question, i spend time upgrading every day 
(well just clicking the applet, typing password and let's go !)

I don't know how often Mageia will be released, and how long all the versions 
will be maintened, i am not sure that a fixed release is the best choice. My 
feeling is that there is a huge hope, maybe not among developers, for a great 
rolling distro (understand great by with many contributors) that could emerge 
among all the fixed released distribution.

The point i want to emphasis is that i still do not understand why my Mandriva 
2010 offers me OOo 3.1 while Mandriva 2010.1 offers OOo 3.2. Can OOo 3.2 work on 
Mandriva 2010 ? It also means that Mandriva should look for patch for OOo 3.1 
and OOo 3.2 to maintain those two versions (and by the way, on a Mandriva 
2009.1 you have OOo 3.1.1-0.3, on 2010 you have OOo 3.1.1-2.5 and on 2010.1 
you have OOo 3.2-4), Mageia will face the same problem. For me, as a user, it 
would be simplier to provide just one version, the latest. Update can be 
delayed, time to test. But i really do not understand why OOo 3.2 is not 
available for Mandriva 2010 nor 2009.1. That's maybe a question of time of 
compilation, take long time to create OOo rpms, it takes 3 times more to 
create OOo rpms for 3 different edition (or is there any technical issue that 
forbid OOo 3.2 on Mandriva 2010 and 2009.1 ?). I also doubt that OOo 3.1 is 
still in development, neither seems OOo 3.2. 

So i would not like the same for Mageia. It is a new project, we shall not 
need to re-take everything from Mandriva, but rather innovate and there i 
guess there is a way to innovate. Maybe a core part of the distribution could 
be in fixed release, the rest in rolling release.

-- 
Olivier M&#233;jean
Pr&#233;sident de l'Association des Utilisateurs Francophones de Mandriva Linux
<A HREF="http://mandrivafr.org">http://mandrivafr.org</A>
twitter : obagoom
identi.ca : goom
</PRE>



<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000623.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000631.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#630">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#630">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#630">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#630">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>