1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Can%20Firefox%20be%20included%20in%20Mageia%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Cloom.20100930T214233-950%40post.gmane.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000499.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000505.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?</H1>
<B>André Machado</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Can%20Firefox%20be%20included%20in%20Mageia%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Cloom.20100930T214233-950%40post.gmane.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?">afmachado at dcemail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Sep 30 21:50:45 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000499.html">[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000505.html">[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#504">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#504">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#504">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#504">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>
><i>From what I understand, to use the name and official logo, we can not
</I>change the binaries. So far so good, but this part caught my attention:
"In addition, if you are distributing Mozilla binaries yourself, and
wish to use the Mozilla Mark(s), you may not
(a) disable, modify or otherwise interfere with any installation
mechanism contained in a Mozilla product;
(b) use any such installation mechanism to install any plug-ins,
themes, extensions, software, or items other than the Mozilla product; or
(c) _use or provide any program, mechanism or process (other than an
installation mechanism contained in the Mozilla product) to install such
product_. Any use of a meta-installer would require our prior written
permission."
Considering that the browser will be packaged in an RPM, I believe that we
should seek permission for the Mozilla Foundation. Fortunately, the very FAQ
points to
<A HREF="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Marketing&format=trademark">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Marketing&format=trademark</A>
and has a e-mail adress: <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">trademarks at mozilla.com</A> .
So, I guess that one of project maintainers should oficially send them a message
asking about this.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000499.html">[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000505.html">[Mageia-dev] Can Firefox be included in Mageia?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#504">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#504">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#504">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#504">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
