1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-bugsquad%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-bugsquad%5D%20INVALID%20-%20OLD&In-Reply-To=%3C50923F5B.1010704%40hiebel.eu%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000182.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000185.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD</H1>
<B>Manuel Hiebel</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-bugsquad%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-bugsquad%5D%20INVALID%20-%20OLD&In-Reply-To=%3C50923F5B.1010704%40hiebel.eu%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD">manuel.mageia at hiebel.eu
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Nov 1 10:22:35 CET 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000182.html">[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000185.html">[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#184">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#184">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#184">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#184">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 01/11/2012 08:34, Marja van Waes a écrit :
><i> Hi everyone,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Before I start going over old NEEDINFO bugs again:
</I>><i>
</I>><i> According to the triage guide, incomplete bugs should, if the
</I>><i> requested info isn't supplied, be closed as INVALID.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I don't see anything about originally*valid* bugs, where later
</I>><i> additional information was requested (e.g. because it was filed
</I>><i> against cauldron and cauldron changed a lot, or because the involved
</I>><i> package was updated).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I did close those as OLD if the reporter didn't reply. Was that good
</I>><i> to do in the first place?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> If it was good: I'm now wondering how I can keep myself from
</I>><i> accidentally closing reports that have*never* been valid, as OLD
</I>><i> instead of as INVALID, if I don't take a lot more time to read the
</I>><i> reports :/
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Cheers,
</I>><i> Marja
</I>
Well the triage guide was originally copy-paste from mdv, so we can do
whatever we want too.
And beside for ours stats, or angry users, I guess make it simple
without detailing doesn't shock anyone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-bugsquad/attachments/20121101/b055b2a7/attachment.html>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000182.html">[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000185.html">[Mageia-bugsquad] INVALID - OLD
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#184">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#184">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#184">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#184">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-bugsquad">More information about the Mageia-bugsquad
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
