1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-artwork%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-artwork%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Artwork%20submission%20rules%20in%20the%20future&In-Reply-To=%3CCAPn0va5VUMig%2BeObA07ce6CztFU1iWQ5krD4uU%3DceJUTHoh3bQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001452.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001454.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future</H1>
<B>Donald Stewart</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-artwork%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-artwork%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Artwork%20submission%20rules%20in%20the%20future&In-Reply-To=%3CCAPn0va5VUMig%2BeObA07ce6CztFU1iWQ5krD4uU%3DceJUTHoh3bQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future">watersnowrock at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu May 31 11:31:43 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001452.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001454.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1453">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1453">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1453">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1453">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 31 May 2012 10:18, Romain d'Alverny <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-artwork">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
><i> Hi there,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> We need a simple, clear policy to follow in the future; that's a
</I>><i> boring part of the work, yes, but not avoidable. Here's a start:
</I>><i>
</I>><i>  - a contribution is acceptable for review for inclusion if:
</I>><i>   - the submitter can be trusted (that's a given at first, but any
</I>><i> serious doubt in this matter should ring a bell),
</I>><i>   - the submitter provides a contact (email is a minimum),
</I>><i>   - a simple, explicit copyright notice, license and history notice
</I>><i> (if there are source works) is provided,
</I>><i>   - it is licensed in a way that permits free redistribution and
</I>><i> modification of it (CC-By-SA, GPL, or more permissive; CC NC or ND
</I>><i> provisions are not acceptable),
</I>><i>
</I>><i>  - a submission without the above notices (copyright, license, history) is void,
</I>><i>
</I>
It should also meet the size requirements - I have had to upscale a
fair few images in the past which is not a good practice.
><i>  - in case of a conflict because of this submission, the submitter
</I>><i> must agree to be reachable and provide assistance to solve the case,
</I>><i>
</I>This needs to be made very clear, as it has happened a few times already.
><i>  - in case of a doubt on the originality of the submitted work, a
</I>><i> check-list should be designed and followed (using Web search tools,
</I>><i> especially image search tools);
</I>><i>
</I>><i>  - artwork team manages the submissions and the clearance checks, if
</I>><i> any. So that the list of final contenders are clear.
</I>><i>
</I>This also has to be the case, we lost a few months of work because non
artwork people stepped in without asking, although in fairness some of
this rests on me for not being 200% clear.
><i> By the way, for this also, could someone make a summary (or send a
</I>><i> pointer) of how the decision for the current background went?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> An alternative to make this scalable is to restrict submissions to
</I>><i> artwork team members/peers, instead of relying on contests.
</I>><i>
</I>Perhaps having a 2 tier system would be good, we create a page for
everyone to submit at, then we, the artwork team, select the valid
submissions to a second pool where final voting happens. Although this
would only really be needed if the submission was very popular.
><i> Thanks
</I>
I also feel that we really need to have our own server space, as
trying to make a flickr group that we can control and is verified as
official doesn't work. So once we have that in place then we can
implement ways to manage it far easier.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001452.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001454.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1453">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1453">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1453">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1453">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-artwork">More information about the Mageia-artwork
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
