1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-artwork%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-artwork%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Artwork%20submission%20rules%20in%20the%20future&In-Reply-To=%3CCANa9xwtVYZxCQ8CYghgVCju6FVRcF_G0kbCs6Us-jOjzSKXD2w%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001451.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001453.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future</H1>
<B>Romain d'Alverny</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-artwork%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-artwork%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Artwork%20submission%20rules%20in%20the%20future&In-Reply-To=%3CCANa9xwtVYZxCQ8CYghgVCju6FVRcF_G0kbCs6Us-jOjzSKXD2w%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future">rdalverny at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Thu May 31 11:18:37 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001451.html">[Mageia-artwork] Mageia 3 goals
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001453.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1452">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1452">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1452">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1452">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi there,
We need a simple, clear policy to follow in the future; that's a
boring part of the work, yes, but not avoidable. Here's a start:
- a contribution is acceptable for review for inclusion if:
- the submitter can be trusted (that's a given at first, but any
serious doubt in this matter should ring a bell),
- the submitter provides a contact (email is a minimum),
- a simple, explicit copyright notice, license and history notice
(if there are source works) is provided,
- it is licensed in a way that permits free redistribution and
modification of it (CC-By-SA, GPL, or more permissive; CC NC or ND
provisions are not acceptable),
- a submission without the above notices (copyright, license, history) is void,
- in case of a conflict because of this submission, the submitter
must agree to be reachable and provide assistance to solve the case,
- in case of a doubt on the originality of the submitted work, a
check-list should be designed and followed (using Web search tools,
especially image search tools);
- artwork team manages the submissions and the clearance checks, if
any. So that the list of final contenders are clear.
By the way, for this also, could someone make a summary (or send a
pointer) of how the decision for the current background went?
An alternative to make this scalable is to restrict submissions to
artwork team members/peers, instead of relying on contests.
Thanks
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001451.html">[Mageia-artwork] Mageia 3 goals
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001453.html">[Mageia-artwork] [RFC] Artwork submission rules in the future
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1452">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1452">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1452">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1452">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-artwork">More information about the Mageia-artwork
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
