[Mageia-sysadm] [678] Do not request @mageia.org packager address for now

Thu Jan 6 18:54:44 CET 2011

Op donderdag 06 januari 2011 17:28:48 schreef Michael Scherer:
+> Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 17:39 +0200, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
+> > Michael Scherer skrev 6.1.2011 16:49:
+> > > Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 16:23 +0200, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
+> > >>> -                packager: '<\S+@<%= escaped_domain %>>$'
+> > >>> +              #  packager: '<\S+@<%= escaped_domain %>>$'
+> > >> 
+> > >> What stops us from starting to give out @mageia.org aliases ?
+> > > 
+> > > Mainly decide who get mageia.org alias.
+> > > 
+> > > IE, who decide who get alias. Are people who open a account on
+> > > identity, people who get promoted, etc ?
+> > 
+> > Well, I'd suggest:
+> > founders should definately use @mageia.org
+> > marketing should definately use @mageia.org
+> > bugzilla/triage team should use @mageia.org
+> > forum admins/moderators should use @mageia.org
+> 
+> Most of the time, that requires to know who is in the team. Ie that the
+> team is created and formalized, at least in ldap side.
+> And that's not the case for a lot of them.
+> 
+> > packagers should use @mageia.org, that way we can enforce the packager
+> > above for all packages going through BS
+> 
+> yup.
+> On the other hand, since people cannot upload without using the account,
+> the email issue is purely cosmetic, and set by the BS.
+> 
+> > For the other contributors that get svn access (translators/web/...)
+> > they could also have the alias (this could be optional, but preferred).
+> 
+> We do have a long list of
+> team :http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=start :)
+> 
+> > For those that only register on identity to get on the forums or to
+> > report a bug, no alias (unless requested and promoted maybe)
+> 
+> well, then, this requires that
+> 1) each team to be formalized and created, with admission process ( ie,
+> most are not, so far, we have sysadmin, ml_moderators, packagers,
+> commiters
+> 
+> And it would be nice to have the delegation for team membership in
+> catdap work ( so far, it is untested )
+> 
+> > > For the rest, the configuration is commented and ready to be deployed
+> > > ( after being tested )
+> > 
+> > I'd say to enable this for founders now so we can test it, and on next
+> > founders meeting we could decide if the above suggestion for the rest is
+> > ok.
+> 
+> Then founders must create a account on catdap. I would rather postpone
+> this for council/board creation, because not everybody seems active, and
+> I rather keep account for active people.
+> 
+> And we need to also discuss on the policy for account expiration. Ie,
+> how long do people keep the alias after leaving the project ?
+> 
+> But I think you can add to whoever will do the agenda for next meeting
+> to discuss this :)
+> 
+> IMHO, that's a project that would requires someone to manage and follow.
+
+i think it's not a bad idea to use ldap groups for the teams and email alias 
+could be given automatically on basis of those chosen ldap groups
+
+i see on longer term people registering in catdap; requesting group membership 
+for a team; and someone from the team leaders to add that person to the ldap 
+group. with no sysadmin intervention.
+