[Mageia-sysadm] [678] Do not request @mageia.org packager address for now

Thu Jan 6 17:28:48 CET 2011

Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 17:39 +0200, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
+> Michael Scherer skrev 6.1.2011 16:49:
+> > Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 16:23 +0200, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
+> >
+> >>> -                packager: '<\S+@<%= escaped_domain %>>$'
+> >>> +              #  packager: '<\S+@<%= escaped_domain %>>$'
+> >>
+> >> What stops us from starting to give out @mageia.org aliases ?
+> >
+> > Mainly decide who get mageia.org alias.
+> >
+> > IE, who decide who get alias. Are people who open a account on identity,
+> > people who get promoted, etc ?
+> >
+> 
+> Well, I'd suggest:
+> founders should definately use @mageia.org
+> marketing should definately use @mageia.org
+> bugzilla/triage team should use @mageia.org
+> forum admins/moderators should use @mageia.org
+Most of the time, that requires to know who is in the team. Ie that the
+team is created and formalized, at least in ldap side.
+And that's not the case for a lot of them.
+
+> packagers should use @mageia.org, that way we can enforce the packager 
+> above for all packages going through BS
+yup.
+On the other hand, since people cannot upload without using the account,
+the email issue is purely cosmetic, and set by the BS. 
+
+
+> For the other contributors that get svn access (translators/web/...) 
+> they could also have the alias (this could be optional, but preferred).
+
+We do have a long list of
+team :http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=start :)
+ 
+> For those that only register on identity to get on the forums or to 
+> report a bug, no alias (unless requested and promoted maybe)
+
+well, then, this requires that 
+1) each team to be formalized and created, with admission process ( ie,
+most are not, so far, we have sysadmin, ml_moderators, packagers,
+commiters
+
+And it would be nice to have the delegation for team membership in
+catdap work ( so far, it is untested ) 
+
+> > For the rest, the configuration is commented and ready to be deployed
+> > ( after being tested )
+> >
+> 
+> I'd say to enable this for founders now so we can test it, and on next 
+> founders meeting we could decide if the above suggestion for the rest is ok.
+
+Then founders must create a account on catdap. I would rather postpone
+this for council/board creation, because not everybody seems active, and
+I rather keep account for active people.
+
+And we need to also discuss on the policy for account expiration. Ie,
+how long do people keep the alias after leaving the project ?
+
+But I think you can add to whoever will do the agenda for next meeting
+to discuss this :)
+
+IMHO, that's a project that would requires someone to manage and follow.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+