From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..db42a6f95 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022223.html @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support

+ Thomas Backlund + tmb at mageia.org +
+ Tue Jan 29 19:19:19 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
Olav Vitters skrev 29.1.2013 14:40:
+> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+>> Olav Vitters skrev 29.1.2013 13:12:
+>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+>>
+>>>
+>>>> And personally, I dont think we should ever bother with the
+>>>> SecureBoot crap as its flawed in so many ways...
+>>>
+>>> I quite like SecureBoot. This way you can avoid attacks on the boot
+>>> sector.
+>>>
+>>
+>> Yeah, and when MS screws up with one of the master keys
+>> (or some hw wendor) think about the "dual-booters"
+>>
+>> Microsft pushes revocation key through windowsupdate, and you
+>> suddenly find out your linux wont boot anymore, beacuse the
+>> signature that is supposed to validate your boot has been
+>> revoked...
+>
+> In which case I'd just turn secure boot off? Same for all the other
+> examples. Maybe it at one point it has to be disabled, but at the moment
+> that is not the case and it provides something useful.
+>
+
+and if the hw vendor has not implemented a way to turn it off...
+
+--
+Thomas
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1