From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7831cb9bd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022210.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support

+ Olav Vitters + olav at vitters.nl +
+ Tue Jan 29 13:40:18 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+> Olav Vitters skrev 29.1.2013 13:12:
+> >On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+> 
+> >
+> >>And personally, I dont think we should ever bother with the
+> >>SecureBoot crap as its flawed in so many ways...
+> >
+> >I quite like SecureBoot. This way you can avoid attacks on the boot
+> >sector.
+> >
+> 
+> Yeah, and when MS screws up with one of the master keys
+> (or some hw wendor) think about the "dual-booters"
+> 
+> Microsft pushes revocation key through windowsupdate, and you
+> suddenly find out your linux wont boot anymore, beacuse the
+> signature that is supposed to validate your boot has been
+> revoked...
+
+In which case I'd just turn secure boot off? Same for all the other
+examples. Maybe it at one point it has to be disabled, but at the moment
+that is not the case and it provides something useful.
+
+-- 
+Regards,
+Olav
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1