From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..746317437 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019168.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

+ Sander Lepik + sander.lepik at eesti.ee +
+ Wed Oct 3 16:32:38 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
03.10.2012 17:19, Frank Griffin kirjutas:
+> However, I still think that Col's solution would be preferable, for the same reasons that 
+> I think a free/nonfree switch in the installer is preferable to excluding nonfree code 
+> from our media and installs unilaterally.
+I have one concern for that solution, how are we gonna build free packages if they can use 
+non-free packages from the same repo. It seems technically a bit too complicated. BS would 
+need some rewrite or we would have to rename a lot of packages that are currently in non-free.
+
+But on the other hand if some packages that require faac and also some package that is both 
+in non-free and in core then how do we solve this problem? Packages in tainted probably 
+don't use non-free as a media for buildrequires.
+
+--
+Sander
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1