From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a81b9972b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019166.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

+ Frank Griffin + ftg at roadrunner.com +
+ Wed Oct 3 16:19:58 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On 10/03/2012 10:07 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
+>
+> OK, let's vote here:
+> - how many people for using 'tainted' ?
+> - how many people for using 'non-free' ?
+>
+> Any solution involving technical changes doesn't qualify for a simple 
+> solution, and doesn't seems worth the effort for just a single package...
+>
+As far as I'm concerned, making it possible for mirror admins to stay 
+within the law trumps ease of use for FOSS believers (i. e. not having 
+to check the license of a tainted package).
+
+So, if we're excluding technical solutions,  I vote tainted.
+
+However, I still think that Col's solution would be preferable, for the 
+same reasons that I think a free/nonfree switch in the installer is 
+preferable to excluding nonfree code from our media and installs 
+unilaterally.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1