From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8378573d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015673.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] absurd comment in default sshd configuration file + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] absurd comment in default sshd configuration file

+ Pascal Terjan + pterjan at gmail.com +
+ Tue May 15 16:11:49 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Guillaume Rousse
+<guillomovitch at gmail.com> wrote:
+> # WARNING: 'UsePAM no' is not supported in Mageia and may cause several
+> # problems.
+> I wonder about the usefulness of such comment...
+>
+> What does means 'not supported' ? The software has been patched, and its
+> behaviour changed in such a way that it will not work as documented ? Or any
+> bug report on bugzilla will automatically result in a question 'did you
+> change UsePAM directive in sshd' before even attempting to identify end user
+> problem ?
+>
+> And as changing ANY configuration directive in ANY software may result in
+> problems, what's the point of a specific warning here ?
+>
+> So, what's the added value of this comment over default configuration ?
+
+I believe the tools used to set some options (like PermitRootLogin)
+which are ignored when UsePAM is true
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1