From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ec54cd1dc --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015671.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] absurd comment in default sshd configuration file + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] absurd comment in default sshd configuration file

+ Guillaume Rousse + guillomovitch at gmail.com +
+ Tue May 15 16:02:29 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
# WARNING: 'UsePAM no' is not supported in Mageia and may cause several
+# problems.
+I wonder about the usefulness of such comment...
+
+What does means 'not supported' ? The software has been patched, and its 
+behaviour changed in such a way that it will not work as documented ? Or 
+any bug report on bugzilla will automatically result in a question 'did 
+you change UsePAM directive in sshd' before even attempting to identify 
+end user problem ?
+
+And as changing ANY configuration directive in ANY software may result 
+in problems, what's the point of a specific warning here ?
+
+So, what's the added value of this comment over default configuration ?
+-- 
+BOFH excuse #371:
+
+Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1